So another year passes and BIM Show Live is almost upon us again…where does the time go? We have been fortunate to present in both 2012 (“Breaking down and understanding Level 2 BIM: An Architect’s perspective”) and 2013 (“IFC: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly”). We were also on the judging panel as well last year. Continue reading
This post has been viewed 13831 times.
“Criticism comes easier than craftsmanship” Zeuxis (approx. 400BC)
For those of you who don’t know me too well, I am somewhat obsessed with IFC, or at least obsessed with working out facts from fiction with IFC exchange. Simply stating “IFC doesn’t work, therefore I refuse to use it” is boring and fundamentally unhelpful. It’s like saying “my phone lost reception so I am never using a phone again”. It’s also too easy to believe certain software companies aren’t interested in improving their IFC implementation. Come on, we can all do better than that. Nothing is perfect and that includes all authoring tools without exception and I am not going to pretend IFC is perfect either, it is far from it. Yet I know that it is perfectly usable for our live projects. Continue reading
This post has been viewed 30177 times.
Before diving into this blog piece i wanted to explain first that whilst i am an ArchiCAD user i always try to look at the bigger picture of BIM, particularly with regards to data. In fact i am becoming more and more uninterested in what can be done in ARCHICAD. There are already plenty of users focussed on asking Graphisoft for ARCHICAD feature improvements that are primarily designed to benefit the model author. My focus is all on the data and how we can use it and export it. For me, my simple mantra is if you can’t export it from an authoring package, and generate a benefit to others, it doesn’t exist. This perhaps may seem a little extreme but with this thought pattern it allows me to focus on the bigger picture of BIM. Continue reading
This post has been viewed 20668 times.